{"id":998,"date":"2025-11-28T20:32:02","date_gmt":"2025-11-28T20:32:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mmchuck.com\/m\/?p=998"},"modified":"2025-11-28T21:09:44","modified_gmt":"2025-11-28T21:09:44","slug":"the-supreme-court-may-use-copyright-law-to-roll-in-social-credit-score","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mmchuck.com\/m\/2025\/11\/28\/the-supreme-court-may-use-copyright-law-to-roll-in-social-credit-score\/","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court May Use Copyright Law To Roll Out Social Credit Score"},"content":{"rendered":"

As I have said in the past, a lot of what our corrupt government and corporate police state do appears to be one thing, while it is setting a slippery slope to do something else that you may not even realize until it is too late.\u00a0 The music industry itself has a long history of theft and treating those under their contract like garbage.\u00a0 The article on the Slate does a bit of passive aggressive propaganda so you might justify the music industry being used by the New World Order to set the precedence where an ISP can be forced to kill people\u2019s access to the internet.\u00a0 They would like for you to think it is just about copyright law, which by the way in itself is unconstitutional in the way it is written.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

From AI:<\/p>\n

The primary constitutional basis for intellectual property is the
\nUnited States Constitution\u2019s Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, which grants Congress the power \u201cTo promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries\u201d. This clause is also known as the Intellectual Property Clause, Copyright Clause, or Patent Clause. This grants Congress the power to enact laws for patents and copyrights, while also implying the power to regulate trademarks.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

US Constitution<\/p>\n

U.S. Constitution
\nArticle I Section 8 | Clause 8 \u2013 Patent and Copyright Clause of the Constitution. [The Congress shall have power] \u201cTo promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.\u201d<\/p>\n

First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Sony Music Entertainment<\/em> is not an author or inventor.\u00a0 It does not sing.\u00a0 It does not play the drums.\u00a0 It does not directly progress science or useful arts.\u00a0 A case can be made that it has a strangle hold on the entertainment industry and in fact may be a detriment to the creative arts through its own monopolistic powers as well as collusion with other players in the game or through coercion such as its attack on Cox.\u00a0 \u201cCave to us or we will destroy you.\u201d<\/p>\n

About Sony Music Entertainment from AI:<\/p>\n

Sony Group Corporation controls significant, but varied, market shares across different entertainment sectors, making it one of the largest global entertainment companies. Sony\u2019s entertainment businesses (games, music, and pictures) collectively account for over 60% of the company\u2019s consolidated sales.<\/p>\n

Here is a breakdown of its market share in key areas:<\/p>\n

Gaming
\nSony Interactive Entertainment (PlayStation) is a dominant player in the global gaming industry, particularly in the high-end console market. It holds a significant share of the video game software publishing industry in the U.S., estimated at around 14.4% of total industry revenue. Globally, Sony\u2019s share in the gaming market was estimated at a cumulative 45.5% in 2023.<\/p>\n

Music
\nSony Music Group (SMG) holds a leading position in recorded music and music publishing:<\/p>\n

Recorded Music: SMG had a global market share of 21.7% in 2024, making it the second-largest major label after Universal Music Group.<\/p>\n

Music Publishing: Sony Music Publishing (SMP) is the market leader, holding an estimated share of 25.2% of global publishing company revenue in 2024<\/p>\n

Sony controls many labels, including its flagship labels like RCA Records<\/strong>, Columbia Records<\/strong>, Epic Records<\/strong>, and Arista Records<\/strong><\/mark>. It also owns numerous other labels across different genres and regions, such as Legacy Recordings<\/strong>, Sony Music Latin<\/strong>, Sony Music Masterworks<\/strong>, and the Provident Label Group<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

But to the larger point, how in the hell does Sony, by trying to destroy the lives of the fans of\u00a0 the willing and unwilling under contract \u201cpromote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.\u201d\u00a0 How can the Supreme Court rule that lower courts were correct in saying that Cox or its users did any economic damage to Sony.\u00a0 What the Supreme Court should rule, but will not, is that Sony, as a near monopoly and with collusion and threats against those who do not bend at the knee to it, that unless the copyrights and trademarks are returned to the actual artists, shall not be enforceable. The Entertainment Industry should be allowed to have a limited license to the work of an artist that they have paid, but that they should never be able to own the catalog of any artist.\u00a0 No member of the entertainment industry should be allowed to obtain the economic power of Sony for it has proved with this lawsuit that it can not be trusted with that power.<\/p>\n

If the Supreme Court rules in favor of Sony it will prove that it is as corrupt as members of Congress responsible for the incompetent way that it has written copyright and trademark law, as they are bribed by lobbyist to not uphold the constitution.\u00a0 Copyright law is for the artist and inventors, who obviously Sony does give their share of the wealth.\u00a0 Copyright and trademark law is not for the near monopolies who do just the opposite of what the constitution demands.<\/p>\n

Hell, not talking about Sony here, but some near monopolies who buy copyrights and trademarks do so to bury the work of artist and scientist.\u00a0 Why is Disney allowed to maintain copyrights and trademarks on the works of its past creators that it has buried and made unavailable to consumers so those works can not compete against the propaganda garbage it is producing now?\u00a0 Why are companies like Sony allowed to break the heart of new artist by putting them under contract and then not allow them to produce or release anything?\u00a0 That is NOT the intent of Copyright and trademark law.<\/p>\n

If you are a once indie artist and you sign with any of these fuckers, and you brag about it, you are basically bragging that you don\u2019t care about the art.\u00a0 You only care about the money.\u00a0 As someone who is probably about to die poor I kind of understand, but still don\u2019t let your epitaph be that you signed with the devil.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Article that set me off:<\/p>\n

https:\/\/slate.com\/news-and-politics\/2025\/11\/supreme-court-sony-cox-copryight-internet-case.html<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

But back to my point, the slippery slope of this potential Supreme Court ruling goes beyond copyright and trademark law.\u00a0 The intent is to eventually give the Corporate Police State and Government the ability to put people on a list that ISP\u2019s must act upon or face lawsuits.\u00a0 That list will be a social\u00a0 credit score.\u00a0 And the people whose score drops too low, will be kicked off the internet.\u00a0 In the future they want to not only ban or shadow ban people off certain sites, they want to make it impossible for those people to be heard on the internet on any website.\u00a0 This Supreme Court has failed us, ruling after ruling, so you pretty much know the internet is about to transition to the most boring place on the face of the earth while at the same time one of the most dangerous places.\u00a0 \u00a0Do not doubt that these modern companies are just as dangerous to your health and welfare as the companies of old.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n